August 29, 2011
The Danger of…Breasts?
Do they approach aggressively and poke you in the eye? Nope. (Not unless you ask them to and the mood happens to strike them.)
Are they the cause of social, economic or political injustice? I don’t think so.
Bare breasts are pretty harmless. Women who walk around (or lay on the grass) topless don’t spread disease, provoke violence or harm children, because nudity is natural — and not necessarily sexual. In a culture that conflates the nudity with sexuality, sexualization and sex, we seem to forget that the simple act of seeing someone else naked is not inherently erotic. Sure, breasts may be arousing, but arousal stimuli are highly subjective. Many people are just as aroused by covered breasts, tight turtlenecks, loose t-shirts that leave a whole heap to the imagination, feet, smiles, sounds, perfume or warm apple pie. Mmm. Apple pie…and the list goes on!
Sure. Topless women can be exciting, sexy and sexual (and there’s nothing wrong with that), but breasts are more than just sexual objects. Exposure to nudity (and a little education and/or rational thought) can also lead to desensitization and the understanding that the naked body is not always erotic — sometimes it is beautiful in a non-sexual way and other times it is easily viewed as functional above all else.
While the women and bra-clad men who marched in the Toronto beach this past weekend may have garnered a crowd of gawkers and trigger-happy photographers, this is not always in the case in places where bare breasts abound. From the nude beaches of Europe to topless tribes of South America (and elsewhere), functional communities manage to prosper despite the baring of chests. Seriously. So let’s get over our fear of nudity and learn to value, respect and appreciate the human form for all of its sexual and non-sexual glory.